Showing posts with label gold. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gold. Show all posts

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Central Bank Gold Reserves Survey with Added Comments from Robert Pringle

Centralbanking.com is out with a new survey of gold reserves at central banks around the world. Robert Pringle is a co author of this article along with Nick Carver. Mr. Pringle advises me that they have done surveys of central bank reserve management including gold  for many years. 


Below I have pasted in the Executive Summary and further below Mr. Pringle kindly agreed to answer a couple of questions related to central bank gold reserves. I see these questions asked quite often and I know many readers have interest in them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Executive summary  

- The Covid‑19 pandemic has not, in the main, changed the view of central banks on gold, although almost one-quarter of respondents said they view gold as a more attractive asset. 

- Central bankers typically expect central bank gold holdings to increase over the next 12 months; no respondent expected a decrease. 

- When determining a central bank’s gold holding, the benefits of diversification stand out as the most relevant factor for reserve managers. 

- One in three central banks said they maintain a target allocation for gold: this rose to 39% of respondents when only those holding gold were considered. 

- Purchases in the global market are by far the most popular means of buying and selling gold, with derivatives second. 

- Overseas storage at a central bank is the preferred way to store gold: more than 80% of respondents said they did this. 

- Central banks are positively disposed to gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs), but active interest in investing is the preserve of a minority. 

- A combination of gold’s quality as a hedge against the US dollar and ETFs’ cost-effectiveness are the main benefits for holding ETFs. 

- Liquidity risk is the chief concern associated with holding gold ETFs, although larger holders say safety regarding physical gold is more of an issue.

Please go here to read the full survey on Centralbanking.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Robert Pringle


Many readers here have interest in gold and also how central banks view gold. In addition, there are many who wonder if any central banks or the IMF have any plans to back their currencies (or the SDR) with their gold reserves. I asked Robert Pringle if he would be willing to give his thoughts on these questions and he agreed to offer them for readers here.


Q: Are you aware of any central bank in the world (including the PBOC in China) that is considering backing its currency with its gold reserves?

A: No, Under IMF rules countries are not permitted to fix their currencies to gold. 

Q: Are you aware of anything that would suggest the IMF is considering backing the SDR with gold reserves or any other asset based anchor?

A: It would make sense to me but is not on the cards at the moment.

Q: In your opinion, how do you think central banks view gold and why do they hold gold reserves?

A: Well, our survey that you have kindly sumarised gives a variety of reasons - and this reflects the views and policies of the central banks themselves.

My own personal view is that despite the long campaigns against gold, the official efforts aiming to fully “demonetise” it in all respects, gold still represents for many people the ultimate reserve asset. 

It will always remain in the wings, waiting patiently to be called on in case of need.  Also, in current conditions of currency competition, gold could be yet another weapon or instrument available to nations aiming to gain a competitive advantage.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My added comments: Robert Pringle is a highly credible expert and well qualified to offer his comments on these questions that I know many readers have. You see his extensive background hereRobert was a founding Director of the Group of 30 Institute on monetary affairs. In 1990, he founded Central Bank Publications and is also the the author of The Power of Money

On a personal note, he has been very kind to offer me his insights on monetary system issues based on his decades of experience working alongside central bankers around the world. He and others continue to hold interest in monetary system reforms. He has specifically proposed using a global market index as a potential anchor for currencies. He explained his idea on that to us here in an earlier blog post.


Thursday, October 22, 2020

Three Important Things I Have Learned Doing This Blog



#1 - Gotta Have This



Longtime readers here know that this blog was started years ago in an effort to offer a free resource to the public for anyone interested in issues that relate to the long term sustainability of our present financial and monetary system. I write this blog from the perspective of the average person who must try to sort through reams of often conflicting and confusing information about the state of our economy and monetary system while trying to make the best personal financial decisions for themselves and their families 


After doing this now for years and having an opportunity to get input and information both from mainstream and alternative media sources along with some excellent direct input from leading experts on these issues from around the world, I certainly have learned some things along the way. 


In this article, I wanted to share what to me are the three most important things I feel I have learned working on this blog for all these years. I will add that every effort has been made here to avoid any political agenda and instead try to focus on just reporting what I understand to be factual information and then let readers use the information to form their conclusions and opinions. Of course I have my own opinions, but the truth is that they don't really matter in terms of impacting anything that will actually happen (this is a main theme of the three most important things I have learned below)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 - If something wants to be viewed as money, it MUST have the trust and confidence of the overwhelming majority of the general public.  

This probably seems obvious and yet I constantly see articles and opinions all across the broad spectrum of views that imply that many people don't fully understand this basic principle. Just during the lifetime of this blog, I have read literally hundreds (perhaps even thousands) of articles and opinions explaining how our present system couldn't last more than just a few more years, or months, or in some cases weeks. The common theme seems to be that with all the enormous debt overhang and explosion of created money (including the US as a prime example of course) that there is simply no way the US dollar can continue to hold on to its position as the global reserve currency very much longer. They say people simply won't accept it as they see all the exploding debt and enormous amounts of created US dollars by the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. Interestingly, most of those who take this position also scratch their heads and say they can't believe the public has not already rejected the dollar and that the system has not already collapsed. They express confusion as to why it has not already happened.

First, if you follow these issues, all these concerns are perfectly valid and no one can seriously say with a straight face that we have not seen debt explode higher and hugely expansive monetary policy at the Fed (both before and even more after the COVID pandemic). So why hasn't both the US dollar and the present system collapsed so far?

I believe it is because for whatever reasons, the overwhelming majority of people still do have trust and confidence in the US dollar and gladly accept it in payment for goods and services. Until something causes a much larger % of the general public to actually lose confidence in US dollars (and therefore not only not want to accept them, but start trying to exchange them for something else), the US dollar continues to get public trust and confidence (despite its flaws). So far, a desire to abandon the dollar by most of the public simply has not happened. Despite all kind of efforts to get people to move away from US dollars (Bitcoin, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, alternative currencies, etc), only a very small % of the general public prefers those alternatives to US dollars. That is just a fact. Even people who are sure the US dollar is or soon will be worthless still accept them and use them. It's perfectly reasonable to raise questions as to how long this will continue, but it is also important to understand that until there is a big change in what most of the general public trusts, we should not be surprised that the US dollar has not yet collapsed. That leads us directly to observation #2.

2- What Matters is What Actually Happens

This may be the hardest truth for most people to accept, but it is a mantra I have repeated here many times on the blog and something I have learned that is beyond question for me. It's human nature to believe that how we want things to be or how we are sure things must be is how they actually are. This can lead to some great frustration when over time it becomes clear that somehow things are not happening "the way they should be happening" based on my own understanding, which of course has to be right. When it comes to making personal financial decisions, this mentality can be destructive. If there is any point I would emphasize to anyone interested in these issues, it is to not get locked in to one viewpoint of how things have to unfold and especially any kind of defined time frame for events to unfold. I would encourage readers not to get so married to one "source" that they are sure can predict a future timeline that they close their minds to other points of view; and for sure don't close your mind to observable facts that contradict what you are sure "has to happen". 

I am prepared to make the following statement after years of reading thousands of articles on these issues and hearing from leading experts all over the world directly.  --- No one on this earth knows for sure how future events are going to play out in terms of when our monetary system may see major changes and when the public might lose confidence and trust in the US dollar. It is reasonable to examine facts, look at trends, and draw conclusions that our present system is not sustainable at some point in the future. But no one can tell you when it might actually change. I recall the late 1970's. At that time, concerns over the sustainability of the system were probably as high as they are today. Inflation was off the charts into double digits. I recall my father telling me that he could see no way the US could avoid bankruptcy in the next 10 years or less because of the way the national debt was getting out of control. Fast forward to 2020. The US still has not defaulted and the US dollar still holds its position as global reserve currency. The point is that my father was sure "it had to happen the way he saw it happening", but he passed away before anything like he expected actually happened. Does this mean it can't happen or won't happen? Certainly not. As we have documented here for years, there are all kinds of systemic risks out there that can lead to major monetary system changes at any time. My main point is that no one knows for sure when "any time" may be. The wisest plan in our view here is to have a plan in mind for a further extended period of time where the present system continues in place and a backup plan in mind in case it fails anywhere along the way. Because, no matter how much I believe something is going to happen or how much I might want something to happen -- when it comes to making a financial plan -- what matters is what actually happens. Here we will always try to focus on reporting what is actually happening as best we can determine it.

3- It is much harder to get consensus for any kind of major change to a system than many people realize

Without a doubt this is one of the three most important things I have learned over the years working on this blog. I see article after article assuring me that "blockchain is the next revolution in the financial system" or that "the IMF has a master plan to issue a global digital currency next year" or "China will replace the US dollar with a gold backed yuan" or "China will replace the US dollar with something else" or "the COVID crisis was created to provided cover to implement a new global monetary system"  etc. etc.  Let me be clear, there are valid reasons why people talk about these kinds of changes and many very intelligent people believe one or the other of them are about to happen. I can also report that there is absolutely legitimate concern about the sustainability of our present monetary system I have gotten directly by email from experts around the world. I have tried to discover and understand all kinds of ideas on how to reform and/or replace our present monetary system if the day comes when that has to happen (some are documented here). 

These concerns comes from every direction. People who think we need to return to gold standard are concerned. People who think we need move towards some kind of cryptocurrency based system (gold backed or otherwise) are concerned, people who like Bitcoin are concerned. People who have worked inside the present system for decades and are leading experts in the world on these issues have concerns. Today, even many people in the general public who don't normally pay much attention to these issues are also concerned. They see the US debt exploding higher and the Federal Reserve expanding its balance sheet to over $7 Trillion. We can easily agree that lots of people are concerned.

Unfortunately, based on what I have seen here studying this for years, that is pretty much where the agreement ends. How to change the system, how to actually implement some kind of new system, how to have a system that promotes fairness and justice, and any kind of actual detailed plan to really implement a new working system are all areas of huge disagreement everywhere I look. 

First, let's understand that nothing changes in a system without the political will and power to make it happen. So how is that going in the US for example? We have the most divided population ever. Trust in all kinds of institutions is at all time lows. Trust for most politicians is based mostly on whether they agree with your views or not and even if they do, trust is still very low. I cannot imagine any kind of consensus in the US coming together for any kind of major changes to our present monetary system without massive opposition from one group or the other (up to and including possible civil unrest). Let's move on to the global community. Let's look at the IMF since so many people feel they will be implementing some kind of new global monetary system any day now. The IMF has (if I recall correctly) 190 member nations.  The US has a 16% vote at the IMF which requires 86% total voting approval for any major rule to be adopted or changed. So the US essentially has veto power. On the flip side, the combined voting power of the BRICS nations can also total up to a veto power. This is a perfect combination for the same kind of deadlock we see in the US political arena. While the IMF does manage to get approval from time to time on various proposals, any kind of major changes are likely to involve nations lining up to protect their own national interests first. Just recently, we noted in a blog article here that the US and India were opposed to the IMF doing a new allocation of SDRs in response to the COVID pandemic. This US has historically been determined to protect the interests of the US dollar at the IMF and everywhere else it can, and there is nothing to suggest that will change. Does all of this suggest to you that we can expect some kind of grand plan to remake the global monetary system to emerge any time soon that will have the consensus required to succeed? If so, I would refer you to point #2 above for a reality check.

Conclusions

The three points listed above are what have led me to report here for a long time on this blog that:

1- Changes in the system tend to be gradual and incremental rather than fast and major
2- Unless we get a huge global financial crisis so large that the present system simply cannot be preserved, the tendency will be to try and preserve the present system for as long as possible despite all the systemic risks that clearly exist to it
3-Obtaining consensus on some kind of new monetary system is almost impossible under the current US and global political atmosphere. Not in the US or globally. Nothing suggests this will change soon.

I believe the biggest reason the above three conclusions are valid is that the risk of trying to change from the present monetary system to something new with no ability to obtain the kind of general public consensus needed is simply too great. Until something changes that equation, I believe authorities are unlikely to take that kind of risk. Not only do you have to have the public buying in to point #1 above (overwhelming majority of people trust it), you have to actually have some kind of new system/currency that can actually be implemented and the technology ready to go to make it happen. None of that exists in any kind of real world tested environment. I am quite sure on that point. There are all kinds of ideas, proposals, and studies on technology changes, but they are nowhere near ready to be implemented in an actual real world situation even if you could get some kind of major consensus on which one to implement (which does not exist now). All this tends to promote stasis (not much change) as the only realistic option left for those in power until something happens out of their control that forces major change away from the US dollar .

I offer this article with the goal of trying to help people like myself sort through an enormous amount of information and disinformation that exists on this important topic. It's prudent and right to raise concerns about the sustainability of the system we have now. A problem can arise however, if you get married to one idea of how this will all play out and make personal financial decisions on the assumption that it has to play out the way you believe it will. I can say that if the leading experts in the world are not sure where all this is going, we can't be either, and we need to keep open minds and be flexible in financial decision making. It's foolish not to try and insure against this kind of uncertainty in any way you can. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Added note: A long time friend and blog reader reviewed this article and sent the comment below. I thought it was an excellent summary:

"This is what I think you are saying (in my own words):

Why is the US dollar still the global reserve currency today? Because there is not any better alternative today. Why has the astronomical US debt and huge FED balance sheet not caused any financial instability so far? Because all nations around the world have dramatically increased their national debt and Central Bank balance sheets in a very coordinated fashion since 2008. In theory, they can continue to do this and leave interests rate at zero forever. In practically, they cannot do it forever. Run away inflation may be beyond the Central Banks’ ability to continue financial control. The next major crisis may cause the problem. The most recent crisis COVID has not done it (so far). I am confident that the status quo will not last indefinitely, but I don’t pretend to know the timing on the inevitable change."

Monday, October 12, 2020

Jim Rickards and Lyn Alden Discuss Inflation/Deflation Monetary Polices and More

One question I see over and over again that people ask is why haven't we seen hyperinflation with all the monetary stimulus and money creation in the US and around the world over the last ten years. It's a good question and the answer may be a bit more complex than many might expect. In this recent panel discussion, Lyn Alden and Jim Rickards tackle this question and offer some interesting thoughts on the answer. Below I have pasted in the video an further below a few bullet points on the full discussion which runs over an hour.




Panel Discussion on 10-5-2020



  • Inflation/Deflation Discussion
  • What causes Inflation - Not Just One Thing
  • Why are monetary policies increasingly failing to achieve their objectives?
  • Thoughts on the upcoming US elections and their Impact on markets
  • Prospects for the Gold Market with all the uncertainty ahead of us

This is a discussion I think readers here can appreciate and learn from, I recommend taking time to listen to the full discussion if possible

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

Robert Pringle Comments on The Telegraph Article -- "When Money Dies, Gold Comes into its Own"

Earlier this year, we did a fascinating interview with Robert Pringle who had just released his new book The Power of Money. Robert has decades of experience working with central bankers from around the world. At one time he was the Director for the Group of 30. He was also the head of The World Gold Council's public policy unit. Robert can talk about events and decision makers from direct first-hand experience which makes his observations extremely valuable. Anyone who has followed the monetary system issues we cover here, which includes the impact of gold over time on that system, will obviously be interested in what Robert has to say. 


With that in mind, we will feature a recent article appearing here in The Telegraph (UK). The article talks about how recent events and central bank monetary policies are causing gold to once again attract attention around the world. We all know gold just recently reached an all time high price in US dollars. This article in The Telegraph makes some interesting statements and we encourage readers to read the full article. Below are a couple of selected excerpts and a few bullet point observations from the article. I sent this article to Robert Pringle and he kindly offered to provide some interesting historical perspective on one of the events mentioned in the article since he was there as a first hand observer. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Telegraph article:

. . . . "It is now relatively commonplace among the super-rich to have at least some small part of their wealth diversified into gold. Call it an insurance policy against “when money dies”, the title of Adam Fergusson’s brilliant history of the Weimar hyperinflation. Few serious economists would think a repeat of this monetary meltdown remotely possible in today’s advanced economies, all of which have strong institutional frameworks to keep inflation in check. But more or less everywhere, currency debasement is now rife to help pay for the burgeoning costs of the Covid-19 crisis and that’s set alarm bells ringing."
. . . . .
"Nor is it just the wealthy who are using gold as a means of hedging themselves against a devalued dollar. The Chinese authorities have been steadily increasing their gold reserves for some years now, resulting in a massive transfer of the metal from West to East."
. . . . .
"Whatever; the fact is that gold tends to sustain its value over time. National currencies, eroded by inflation and political manipulation, do not."
. . . . .
"As I say, a rising gold price reflects, above all other things, a loss of trust in the value of fiat currencies, for which there is good reason right now."

This article, as shown above, states that gold has held up over time in terms of holding its purchasing power better than national fiat currencies in general. It also says:

- the UK sold off a large amount of its gold reserves at much lower prices years ago (see Robert Pringle's recollection of that event below)
- current central bank policies in response to COVID-19 are debasing currencies
- the least painful way of dealing with debt overhang is to "inflate it away"
-"gold bugs" may end up being right about future inflation despite the present threat of deflation that central banks are currently fighting

Robert Pringle reviewed this Telegraph article and offered these observations based on his own personal experiences:


"I was quite deeply involved in orchestrating the public opposition to these sales (1999 UK gold sales) with the slogan “Hands off our gold!” The World Gold Council took a whole page advertisement in leading popular newspapers to protest. This intensely annoyed ministers. Then I was called into Her MAJESTY’S TREASURY  for a personal reprimand by Gus O’Donnell, senior adviser to Brown and later head of the British Civil Service and top adviser to three prime ministers. He was intensely irritated. He told me: “This is not the way to influence Ministers”!

We also ran a call centre campaign. On day one the call centre, which had 20 agents answering calls, crashed in the first 20 minutes.  We also sailed a barge up the Thames and parked it outside the House of Commons. It had a banner on it saying ‘Gordon Brown & Co: Scrap Metal Merchant’ with pots and pans painted in gold colour. Pictures that appeared were on the front page of  leading national newspapers the next morning.

The sale was a personal decision by Gordon Brown on the advice of the Treasury mandarins who thought it would make him look “modern” and of course it all came unstuck. It would plague him for the rest of his career and remains one of the great blots on his reputation.

I also played a role in persuading central banks to to do something about the collapse of the gold price when they put a floor under the market later that year - but that’s a story for another day (for those who can’t wait it is told in my book The Power of Money -page 189)."   ---  Robert Pringle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Added note: A thank you to Robert for sharing these recollections for readers here. These kinds of observations coming from someone directly involved with the event are hard to find and much appreciated here. Perhaps he will share more on the central bank agreement done in 1999 to limit gold sales. He talks about it in his book for those who recall that agreement and want to learn more about it. One thing I have learned from Robert over the years is that events like this are understood with better insight if you have input from those directly involved at the time. 

Here is a BBC article from 2019 that provides some additional historical background for the UK gold sale. It also references the 1999 central bank agreement to limit gold sales that Robert talks about above from personal recollection.

Monday, September 7, 2020

What Happens in 2021 Regardless of Who Wins the US Elections? Michael Oliver Interview

Massive attention is now focused on the upcoming US elections. Most everyone believes that who wins the election will have a huge impact on their daily lives. Of course both sides feel that if the other side wins, the impact will be very bad and if their side wins, the impact will be very good. We won't try to get involved with any of that here. First, we don't know who the next President will be. Next, we don't know if that person will have a Congress controlled by his own party or not. Finally, if this election turns out to be very close, we don't even know for sure how long it will be before we know who our next President will be or who will be the new members of Congress. All of that is beyond our ability to forecast here.



What we can do is try to look at all the possible outcomes and then try to assess how they might impact our economy and our monetary system which is what we focus on here. We listed three possible scenarios:

1- President Trump wins re election (but what will Congress look like?)
2- Former VP Joe Biden is elected (but what will Congress look like?)
3- We have no clear winner in November and it takes weeks to months to get a winner (both for President and in terms of which party controls the House and Senate)

That's three scenarios, but all the additional possible scenarios depending on who controls the House and Senate create a complicated matrix of possibilities.

How are we to deal with this much complexity and uncertainty in terms of trying to assess the future and make personal financial decisions? Let's look at this a bit differently in terms of how it might impact our economy and our monetary system going forward.

Obviously, which side wins will impact the fiscal policies put forward by the Federal government. Both sides have made it pretty clear what they would do if elected so that is not all that complicated. If one side or the other sweeps the election and controls Congress and The White House, you can assume they will move to implement the taxing and spending policies they have outlined. Complication sets in if neither side is able to gain control of both The White House and Congress. In that scenario, it is reasonable to expect just more of the same we have had for a long time now (deadlock) and the intensity of opposition to whoever is in The White House ramped up even higher -- as hard as that may be to imagine. The US is no longer a nation of a majority being in the middle. It has split into two very divergent camps that have made it clear they will carry on a "resistance" using all means available against the other side if they are not in power. So we should expect all the above no matter who wins this November.

Perhaps another way to look at this is to ask: Will there really be a major disruption in our economic system and our monetary system in the next four years or not? Regardless of who our next President may be?

This, we think this is the more important question to consider because if we don't see all that much major change (just tweaking of tax rates and which special interests benefit the most from government spending as usual), we can make one set of personal financial decisions based on that scenario relatively easily.

On the other hand, what if next year in 2021 (or even earlier), we really do start to see major disruption in our present system? Either from radical changes in fiscal policies, major declines ramping up in the stock and bond markets, or from lingering effects from the economic fallout from the global pandemic. This is the scenario predicted by  Michael Oliver in the interview just below. We recommend readers listen to the full interview to get his perspective on what to expect. Further below we will offer a summary of his view and some added thoughts on what that means for each of us trying to make personal financial decisions





Michael Oliver is an investment adviser who has had a very solid track record forecasting future long term market trends over time. He is now laying out a long term forecast that is in line with what others we have noted here are saying (like Jim Rickards and Ray Dalio for example). They are predicting we will start seeing events that will finally lead to disruption of our existing economic and monetary system. All of them are advising people to take a defensive position and acquire hard assets as insurance against an uncertain future. Lately, we see even Berkshire taking a more defensive position in it's portfolio.

In the interview above, Michael Oliver sees a US stock market peaking out soon (perhaps in September) and starting into a long term slow decline (not a crash, a long term slow decline). He sees the bond market following that later on next year as the Fed loses its ability to control longer term interest rates. He says the downturns in the stock and bond markets will lead to more money flowing into commodities of all kinds including gold and silver in the coming years. He says that these changes are due to decades long trends that cannot be reversed no matter who wins the elections this fall. Analyzing these kinds of long term trends is his area of expertise.

In our view here, this is what readers need to consider for personal financial decisions. Not so much who wins the upcoming elections, but what will actually happen next year regardless of who has won. If nothing much changes in the basic system, then readers can use one set of assumptions in making personal financial decisions. If Michael Oliver and others are right, readers would likely use a  different set of assumptions in making personal decisions because markets that have worked for a long time may not continue to work while others take over and move into long term up trends.

The view here is that having a plan in mind for either outcome (not much change or the major changes Michael Oliver predicts) is a good idea. We are living in possibly the most uncertain time in my lifetime in terms of projecting where things are going in the next four years after this election. This is the time to think more broadly about how to plan for that rather than more narrowly. I say this in terms of being ready for several more years of just minor tweaks to the system or being ready for big market shifts out of stocks and bonds and into hard assets. There is a growing list of credible mainstream market analysts predicting the latter. As an example, the Telegraph (UK) runs this article. (See note below for more on this article in The Telegraph)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to readers: Coming up on the blog over the next week are two articles with direct input from experts. First, Dr. Warren Coats comments on a recent article calling for a new allocation of SDRs at the IMF in response to COVID-19. Dr. Coats is the former head of the SDR Division at the IMF.

Next, Robert Pringle comments on an article appearing in the The Telegraph (UK) that talks about gold's recent rise versus fiat currencies. Robert offers some insight based on his personal involvement with one of the events mentioned in this Telegraph article (the UK sale of some of its gold reserves). 

These are two upcoming articles I encourage readers not to miss.

Sunday, July 26, 2020

News Note: Jim Rickards on Gold Soaring to All Time US Dollar High Over $1921 - Ray Dalio on US Dollar

This is a news note due to events unfolding this Sunday evening. At the time of this writing, gold has clearly gone well above the old all time high price in US dollars at around $1921. Right now, spot gold is quoted on Kitco just above $1930 per ounce.


Earlier today, Ray Dalio issued comments on Fox Business  about his concerns over how all these current events may impact the US dollar and economic stability. He specifically expressed concerns about the "soundness of our money" (see excerpt below).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The biggest issue Dalio is worried about is "the soundness of our money."

"You can't continue to run deficits, sell debt or print money rather than be productive and sustain that over a period of time," Dalio said."

Go To Fox Business to find the full comments by Ray Dalio
(note- Fox Business does not permit direct links to articles - search for Ray Dalio)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My added comments: Obviously, we have a lot of potential stressors going on in various markets alongside a pandemic, the economic fallout from a pandemic and now also geopolitical tension. It pretty much goes without saying that readers need to monitor events closely with all this going on at the same time. I quickly asked Jim Rickards if he would like to offer some thoughts on the events we are seeing tonight. He kindly replied with the email comment below for readers here:

"This new price spike emerged in Asian trading on July 27 before London or New York had opened. Given the deteriorating state of U.S.-China relations and the potential resort to financial warfare, including the possible seizure of China's Treasury note holdings as compensation for victims of China's criminally negligent handling of the initial outbreak, it could well be the case that China and its people are flocking to gold as an alternative to dollar-denominated holdings such as Treasuries."  - James Rickards    (7-26-2020 10:30 pm cst.)


Added note on Jim Rickards - Jim has a new book coming out in October with an update on his most recent analysis as to where he sees things headed. Pretty sure this will be another best seller.







Below is the Kitco quote at 10:18 pm central standard time. Silver also sharply higher.


MetalsDateTime
(EST)
BidAskChangeLowHigh
GOLD07/26/202023:181937.101938.10
+35.80
+1.88%
1899.601942.60
SILVER07/26/202023:1824.0924.19
+1.38
+6.08%
22.6624.29




"A record high price for gold, known as the currency of last resort, is raising questions about the U.S. dollar's future as the world's reserve currency, according to a Goldman Sachs research note published Tuesday."








Thursday, July 23, 2020

Gold and Silver Markets Reflect Significant Surge in Demand - Some Reasons Why

While this blog is not investment related and does not claim any special expertise in precious metals, we do monitor these markets because they tend signal when there is a general feeling of uncertainty about economic conditions. Lately, both gold and silver have moved up more sharply in price. Silver has also now begun to "catch up" with gold as reflected in the sharply falling gold to silver ratio.


Rather than try to provide any in depth analysis, we will just list some bullet points below as potential reasons we have seen offered for the recent strong moves higher. Following that are a few links to recent articles noting what is going in these markets.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- fundamental demand  vs. supply issues - falling supply due to mine closures during the pandemic at the same time as global demand picked up for physical gold and silver

- general uncertainty surrounding the impact of the virus pandemic on the stability of the economy and financial system

- a general perception by investors that the increased monetary stimulus from global central banks in response to the virus pandemic will tend to devalue fiat currencies (the US dollar is certainly reflecting that lately). 

- the markets anticipating possible future inflation because of all the money creation

- possible tightness and/or stress in the Comex futures exchange for both gold and silver that is demanded for physical delivery. Again, reflecting tight supply vs. demand.

- a surge in retail demand for gold and silver coins that is drawing in a broader group of buyers than is the norm for these markets. See video below asking if millennials have "discovered" gold and silver.

-an increasing number of investment advisers recommending clients allocate %5 or more to gold and silver in their portfolios. As noted below, Ray Dalio was advising this a year ago. Of course, Jim Rickards who we have covered here quite a bit, has long advised a 10% allocation to precious metals.

- low real interest rates (or negative real interest rates) make gold more appealing

- some central banks around the world continue to add physical gold to their reserves

Here are a few articles and videos that talk about various aspects of what experts in these markets are seeing in these markets:









At the time of the writing of this article, spot silver is $22.51. Here is a sample of what various dealers want for a one ounce silver eagle at this same point in time. Not much available under $30. This suggests there is still a market imbalance in demand for silver eagles vs. available supply as this is a much higher premium over silver for these coins than we usually see in more normal circumstances.







Added note: Coming in the next few weeks will be an interview I did with my own daughter who is 25 years old on what she thinks about money and some monetary systems issues. She provides an interesting sample of opinion and some of her comments echo what I see quite often from millennials. After the interview article, I will post a followup article based on her comments on the issues involved. The goal of that article is to try to ask some thought provoking questions about concerns millennials have for the future. I did run this interview by some experts who told me that the interview answers were interesting and provide some useful insight into current thinking in that age group.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

News Note: Gold Hits Highest Quaterly Closing Prince Since 2012

It appears our recent educational article on gold was pretty timely. Gold ends the second quarter of 2020 closing at its highest quarter ending price since 2012. You can look at its chart over that time period here


Below I have pasted in links to some articles noting the strong closing price for gold for this quarter. Interest in gold is obviously on the increase with the pandemic and the central bank response to the pandemic likely being a couple of the primary reasons for that interest. Gold can be an important indicator so it is always useful to keep an eye on how its price is trending in relation to major currencies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Safe-haven demand and dovish central bank expectations have sparked fund buying of precious metals in recent months. Long gold positions in ETFs on Monday rose to a new record high of 3,199.12 MT (data since 2002). Also, long silver positions in ETFs rose to a new record high of 773.68 million ounces on Monday."



“Bulls are delighted with what will almost certainly be a strong close, which provides the basis for a push to $1,800 in short order.” Gold, long considered a hedge against inflation and currency debasement, was headed for its third month of gains, driven by stimulus measures to support economies decimated by the pandemic."


"Gold prices are sharply higher and hit an 8.5-year high Tuesday, on technical buying based on very bullish charts that got even more bullish today—suggesting still more (likely much more) upside price potential to come, including new record highs."
                                            
Jim Rickards Weighs in on the Gold Price Action

"Today’s price of $1,782 per ounce is the highest since 2012 and a 70% gain from the low of $1,050 per ounce at the end of the last bear market in December 2015." (editors note: Jim called the low in December 2015 as a bottom and the start of a new bull market for gold years ago).


American Eagle 2020 One Ounce Gold Proof Coin

Sunday, June 21, 2020

All About Gold

Whenever economic conditions become unstable and the confidence of the general public is shaken, gold tends to re-surface as a topic of interest. As we have explained here before, gold is one market we monitor because it can provide signals as to how much confidence may be waning in the present system at any given point in time.



If you do any significant research into gold, you know that gold is a topic that for whatever reasons generates a lot of drama and passionate feelings pro and con. Here, we prefer to look at gold without the drama and examine its role over time as money, a hedge, and an insurance policy of last resort. That is what gold has been for thousands of years for billions of people. Anyone who wants to understand the kinds of economic and financial issues that shape world events must have some level of understanding of gold's economic role in both history and at the present time. 


With that in mind, we will feature the two part video documentary below as an educational opportunity for anyone interested in learning all about gold. This documentary does as good as any I have seen in providing that kind of educational opportunity.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Story of Man's 6,000 Year Obsession



Part I




Part II



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My added comments: While this documentary is a few years old now, the information presented is as relevant today as it was when it was released. The documentary traces the historic role of gold as money going back thousands of years, walks you through how gold is discovered, mined and refined into retail products, and attempts to peek into the future to see what role gold may play going forward either inside or outside the official monetary system. No matter how you feel about gold, you cannot watch this documentary and come away without learning anything. For that reason, we will include this article in our Marketplace of Ideas for Monetary System Reform as an educational resource on gold.

Added notes: Jim Rickards authors this recent article he titles "Why Gold?" and Jan Nieuwenhuijs authors: Why Gold and Why Now?

Alasdair Macleod, in this recent article, presents a potential worst case scenario where the US dollar collapses within the next year and only gold and silver survive the carnage. 

Former US Mint Director Edmund Moy says he keeps physical gold close at hand and views it as a hedge.


Reuters- Goldman Hikes 12 month gold price forecast to $2,000


Reuters article: World's Ultra Wealthy Go for Gold (excerpt below):

"Nine private banks spoken to by Reuters, which collectively oversee around $6 trillion in assets for the world’s ultra-rich, said they had advised clients to increase their allocation to gold. Of them, four provided forecasts and all saw prices ending the year higher than they are now."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional added note: A thank you to blog reader BK who sent me the comment below by email related to the Reuters article above on wealthy clients being advised to allocate 5% to gold.

"A 5% allocation to gold is, fortunately, only $300 billion, about the market cap of Visa in the Dow.

However, a ton of gold only sells today for about $55 million, so it takes about 5400 tons, at "present prices" to achieve that allocation.

Since China and Russia produce combined about 600 tons of annual gold production, which they do not sell abroad, the total remaining production of about 2400 tons is what is available to fulfill this “new demand”.  So, if no other demand were to compete with these newcomers, it would still take 2 years and 3 months to complete this allocation from new stocks of metal.

But, how likely is it that the traditional sources of demand, augmented by more recent central bank purchases, would suddenly stop?  Will India weddings abandon gold?  World Jewelry demand? Industrial uses?

If I am correct, and the figures above have any validity, the claim that wealth advisors now recommend a 5% allocation to gold, to their super rich clients, is meaningless.  They are, as a group, already “locked out” of the physical market.  If they try to make a move, within a short period of time, they will so quickly spike the price that they will shut down the market. So, how much gold could they acquire without jolting the market?   Perhaps 4,5, maybe 600 tons per year? That might be do-able, but they would need 10 years to complete their acquisition.

One unlikely assumption in all the above is that “present prices” would prevail during this small shift in allocation to gold.  If prices increased by a factor of 10, then much less NEW gold would be needed, and indeed some significant selling from EXISTING private stocks would be expected to occur, particularly from areas ( The East ) where buyers are “price sensitive”. ( they buy when prices drop, and sell when prices have risen )   Would those “super rich” new gold buyers mind that they had to pay a huge premium to achieve their allocation?  That is hard to say.  They clearly don’t mind paying 4 or 5 times as much for a share of stock as they did 2 or 3 years ago, so perhaps they wouldn’t mind doing the same for gold.  (but for stocks, there always has to be a story.  For gold, what would the “story ”be? )

Physical gold has one huge problem for the financial industry, which takes in hundreds of billions in earnings per year in advisory, trading, and market making roles.  NO FEES.  Physical Gold sits quietly in a vault, and apart from minor storage costs, that’s it."  from reader BK